Build reviewers are experienced ecommerce consultants. They have shipped real ecommerce projects. They know what a bad database schema costs at scale, what a broken checkout flow does to conversion, and what agencies charge to fix it. That context is what makes their review meaningful.
They are not passive approvers. During every collector session, the reviewer watches the Q&A live as it happens — a real-time feed of every AI question and every customer answer. They inject structured context into active sessions: flagging edge cases, noting data model constraints, surfacing integration risks before the generator ever runs.
After the generator produces output, they inject review feedback — rejection reasons, schema notes, page flow guidance — structured fields that feed directly into any regeneration request.
At Development stage, the reviewer does the full job: code review, manual testing of all critical and edge case flows, database schema validation, E2E test coverage verification, quality assurance sign-off.
Both customer and Honnos reviewer must approve before promotion to live. Either party can reject. The process iterates until both approve.
This is why we can guarantee quality at a fraction of agency cost. The AI does the heavy lifting. The expert catches what the AI misses. Nothing ships without a human who is accountable for the result.